Thursday, April 27, 2006
Evan Brown on Defamation:
- Evan reminded me after his talk that about a year ago I sent him a link to a funny California defamation case involving an online list of "Top Ten Dumb Asses," on which the plaintiffs were "listed as the number 1 and number 2 dumb asses, respectively." He opened by discussing this case and the differences between permissible opinion and actionable defamation.
- Evan mentioned the fair reporting privilege defense to defamation claims, and also that consent is a defense. That struck me as one that could get interesting in a blogging case (e.g., what degree of consent might a link back to the allegedly defamatory remark convey?)
- Discussion of New York Times v. Sullivan and the increased burden on a defamation plaintiff who is a public figure, i.e.: in order for the plaintiff in such a case to prevail the statement has to be false and made with actual malice. Dennis Crouch wondered about bloggers as public figures (here's a musty but related B&B post), and Evan pointed out there are cases where a plaintiff has been found to be a public figure "for a limited purpose."
[Technorati tag: bloglaw]
Unless otherwise expressly stated, all original material of whatever nature created by Denise M. Howell and included in the Bag and Baggage weblog and any related pages, including the weblog's archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.